The Party of the Damned

Daniel Kalder reflects on the fate of world leaders, from cock of the walk one minute to feather duster the next. All is vanity!

Recently I acquired a collection of LIFE magazines from 1971, and was curious to see what was making the news back then. You can probably guess some of the topics (e.g. the Vietnam War) and you’ve probably forgotten others (the opening of an airport on the Seychelles). As for me, I was particularly interested in the October 29th issue, not because of the David Cassidy cover but because it promised a report on “Kings, Queens, Emperors at the Shah’s Party.”

I’ve been interested in Reza Pahlavi, the last Shah of Iran, ever since I read Ryszard Kapuscynski’s The Emperor some years back. The party in question – held in the ruins of Persepolis to celebrate the 2,500th anniversary of the founding of the Persian Empire – is described in Kapuscynski’s book as a nadir for Pahlavi’s regime, the point at which the gulf between the Shah’s autocratic excess and his people’s poverty became unbridgeable.

Of course, it’s easy to pronounce that type of judgment when you have hindsight. The interesting thing about the LIFE article was that the journalist had no idea that within eight years the Shah’s regime would be history. For all he knew the Shah’s policies – rights for women, friendship with the United States and Israel, a glorification of the pre-Islamic past, secret police imprisoning Marxists – would continue forever. His report was an awe-struck report on powerful people consuming conspicuously:

“They came from 69 nations: one emperor, eight kings and a cardinal, grand dukes, crown princes, and sheikhs, presidents, premiers and vice presidents…They dined sumptuously on roast peacock, drank the finest wine… Fifty gold-threaded uniforms for (the) royal court cost $1,000 each…Colored light bulbs alone cost $840,000.”

The pictures were impressive too – especially the one of Iranian troops dressed as Parthian cavalry circa 250BC. The most interesting thing about the article, however, was its description of the guests, a motley assortment of figureheads, second-in-commands and tyrants, almost all of whom – much like the Shah – met with sticky ends.

Consider:

• Emperor Hailie Selassie of Ethiopia, who toured the ruins of Persepolis with Cheecheebee, his pet Chihuahua. Three years later he would be dead, his ancient dynasty destroyed by Stalinist nut jobs. In 1992, his bones were found under a toilet. I hope he enjoyed the roast peacock.

• Or how about the Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceasescu? In 1989 he and his wife, Elena, would be lined up and shot, much to the delight of a disgruntled populace.

• Then there was Imelda Marcos, very glamorous amid the Shah’s silk tents. Largely remembered today for her enormous shoe collection, she and husband Ferdinand ruled the Philippines from 1965 to 1986 until revolution forced them to flee.

Other illustrious guests represented countries that have since ceased to exist, such as the U.S.S.R.’s Nikolai Podgorny (kicked off the Politburo in 1977) and Ludvik Svoboda of Czechoslovakia (removed from power in 1975). Marshal Tito may have made it to the grave in glory, but the country he built, Yugoslavia, dissolved in a bloodbath not long afterward.

Even Spiro Agnew, Nixon’s deputy, would be out of a job within two years – the only U.S. vice president to ever resign due to criminal charges.

It was eerie. I felt like an oracle, watching the high and mighty of 1971 from far above, aware of fates they could not imagine. From my prognosticative perch, afforded me by the fact I was located 40 years in future, these great men and women seemed not powerful, but powerless. I understood why the Ancient Greeks envisaged Fortune as a cosmic wheel, rising only to fall again.

Of course, given events around the world in the last couple of months, we can see that the Greeks were absolutely correct. This time last year could ex-President Ben Ali of Tunisia have imagined that he would be lying on a bed in Saudi Arabia, an exile, a stroke victim, wanted by Interpol?

Or what about Hosni Mubarak? One day he’s a close ally of the U.S. intent on installing his son Gamal in the presidency as his successor, the next he’s living under house arrest, facing possible criminal charges.

Then of course there’s Colonel Muammar Gaddafi – former recipient of tongue baths from Tony Blair, shamelessly courted by European governments and prestigious institutions of higher education … and the next minute the very same sycophants are dropping bombs on him.

And let us not forget Moscow’s ex-mayor, Yury Luzhkov – master of the city one minute, unemployed billionaire pensioner the next.

So we see that the Shah’s Party of the Damned is an ongoing affair, even if the actors have changed and the locations vary. And the truth is, ordinary folk like you and me are also invited – it’s just that nobody will be looking at our pictures in magazines like LIFE 40 years after we have stumbled and fallen.

(RIA Novosti previously published a version of this post).

Share This Post

About Author Profile: Daniel Kalder

Daniel Kalder is an author and journalist. Visit him online at www.danielkalder.com.

6 thoughts on “The Party of the Damned

  1. jgslang@gmail.com'
    June 15, 2011 at 08:34

    ‘Dictators always look good until the last minutes.’ Thomas Masaryck

  2. Worm
    June 15, 2011 at 08:44

    the dabbler series that keeps on giving!

  3. johngjobling@googlemail.com'
    malty
    June 15, 2011 at 09:55

    The television documentary about the Shah’s missus was fascinating, obviously a cracker in her time there was still a semblance, as there is with many old buildings, of the former glory. Coming complete with more edge than a broken bottle and an attitude akin to Concorde’s nose she radiated spent power, a tarted up busted flush.
    The great pity is, and this may yet convert into Armageddon, that if only he had been twenty five percent less manic then the present bunch of blue touch paper lighting psychopaths may never have seen the light of day.

    The old lion was a sort wasn’t he, Jah he is my lord, he am dee lion of Judah, I-a-not-a-dee-afraid (courtesy of Jesus Dread)

  4. Gaw
    June 15, 2011 at 10:07

    I do enjoy the mildly humiliating and undignified sight of the removal vans turning up at Downing Street once the result is through. The pantechnicon is obviously vastly preferable to piano wire, a bullet, a length of rope or the midnight flit in a private jet as a means of removal.

  5. rosie@rosiebell.co.uk'
    June 15, 2011 at 14:00

    I have vague memories of seeing that photo spread – wasn’t Princess Anne there? When the Queen gets pissed off with being a constitutional monarch, she must look at such articles and chuckle. I wonder if she keeps a list of those whose hands she shook who met untimely and nasty deaths?

  6. mail@danielkalder.com'
    June 16, 2011 at 20:44

    Yes- Princess Anne and Prince Philip turned up. The Queen or her advisers felt the Shah was a bit too dodgy to be given the full British royal treatment. apparently Princess Anne had a fine old time riding horses around Persepolis.

Comments are closed.