<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I Should Be The Next Director General Of The BBC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedabbler.co.uk/2012/11/why-i-should-be-the-next-director-general-of-the-bbc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedabbler.co.uk/2012/11/why-i-should-be-the-next-director-general-of-the-bbc/</link>
	<description>A Culture Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:46:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Key</title>
		<link>http://thedabbler.co.uk/2012/11/why-i-should-be-the-next-director-general-of-the-bbc/#comment-35036</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Key</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedabbler.co.uk/?p=28386#comment-35036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr Slang : I think I will be able to shoehorn the interludes into my revised schedule. Come to think of it, it may be rather a question of shoehorning my schedule into constant repeats of the interludes.

Nige : The revived Listener will include content based on programmes. We just won&#039;t broadcast (or indeed make) the programmes, forcing the licence payer to read the printed word instead. 

Rest assured I shall be properly attired.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Slang : I think I will be able to shoehorn the interludes into my revised schedule. Come to think of it, it may be rather a question of shoehorning my schedule into constant repeats of the interludes.</p>
<p>Nige : The revived Listener will include content based on programmes. We just won&#8217;t broadcast (or indeed make) the programmes, forcing the licence payer to read the printed word instead. </p>
<p>Rest assured I shall be properly attired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nige</title>
		<link>http://thedabbler.co.uk/2012/11/why-i-should-be-the-next-director-general-of-the-bbc/#comment-35035</link>
		<dc:creator>Nige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedabbler.co.uk/?p=28386#comment-35035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh gosh, those films took me back - and talk of the dear old Listener (which closed shortly after dispensing with my services - the Curse of Nige I&#039;m afraid). There might be a small problem with reviving it, Frank, as nearly all its content was related to TV and radio programmes and there won&#039;t really be any under yr eminently sounds plans for the BBC. Even the Googie Withers partwork would only last so long... And yes Mahlerman, you&#039;re surely right about the neckwear revival - the sight of the new man &#039;in charge&#039; arriving at work tieless, shirt barely tucked in, cardboard coffee in hand was another sure sign...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh gosh, those films took me back &#8211; and talk of the dear old Listener (which closed shortly after dispensing with my services &#8211; the Curse of Nige I&#8217;m afraid). There might be a small problem with reviving it, Frank, as nearly all its content was related to TV and radio programmes and there won&#8217;t really be any under yr eminently sounds plans for the BBC. Even the Googie Withers partwork would only last so long&#8230; And yes Mahlerman, you&#8217;re surely right about the neckwear revival &#8211; the sight of the new man &#8216;in charge&#8217; arriving at work tieless, shirt barely tucked in, cardboard coffee in hand was another sure sign&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Slang</title>
		<link>http://thedabbler.co.uk/2012/11/why-i-should-be-the-next-director-general-of-the-bbc/#comment-35012</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Slang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedabbler.co.uk/?p=28386#comment-35012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a license payer - or so I was informed the other day when I received a threatening missive despite not in fact having permitted a set in my house since 2003 - I trust my voice will not go unheard. Where will you stand on the Interlude, that bedrock of the Corporation&#039;s &#039;golden years&#039; (the recent disturbing, indeed near-shattering allegations in re &#039;Uncle Mac&#039; notwithstanding). Especially this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-wmbM6EpZU

and this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtOjGXZ5sLM&amp;feature=relmfu

Surely, with the newly trimmed down schedules, there should be plenty of opportunities for their triumphant return. A nation, dare I suggest, awaits.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a license payer &#8211; or so I was informed the other day when I received a threatening missive despite not in fact having permitted a set in my house since 2003 &#8211; I trust my voice will not go unheard. Where will you stand on the Interlude, that bedrock of the Corporation&#8217;s &#8216;golden years&#8217; (the recent disturbing, indeed near-shattering allegations in re &#8216;Uncle Mac&#8217; notwithstanding). Especially this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-wmbM6EpZU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-wmbM6EpZU</a></p>
<p>and this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtOjGXZ5sLM&#038;feature=relmfu" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtOjGXZ5sLM&#038;feature=relmfu</a></p>
<p>Surely, with the newly trimmed down schedules, there should be plenty of opportunities for their triumphant return. A nation, dare I suggest, awaits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mahlerman</title>
		<link>http://thedabbler.co.uk/2012/11/why-i-should-be-the-next-director-general-of-the-bbc/#comment-35008</link>
		<dc:creator>mahlerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedabbler.co.uk/?p=28386#comment-35008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed Gaw. The sight of Paxman sans tie recently is a sure sign that ties (or perhaps cravats, Nige?) are about to make a welcome return to public life.  I think it is these small details that count, don&#039;t you Frank?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed Gaw. The sight of Paxman sans tie recently is a sure sign that ties (or perhaps cravats, Nige?) are about to make a welcome return to public life.  I think it is these small details that count, don&#8217;t you Frank?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaw</title>
		<link>http://thedabbler.co.uk/2012/11/why-i-should-be-the-next-director-general-of-the-bbc/#comment-34995</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedabbler.co.uk/?p=28386#comment-34995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope you&#039;re planning to wear a tie.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you&#8217;re planning to wear a tie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mahlerman</title>
		<link>http://thedabbler.co.uk/2012/11/why-i-should-be-the-next-director-general-of-the-bbc/#comment-34993</link>
		<dc:creator>mahlerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedabbler.co.uk/?p=28386#comment-34993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well Frank, I&#039;m with you on most of that. A life without Petroc Trelawny and Vanessa Feltz will be difficult for a while, but I will be able to &#039;move on&#039; eventually. The main problem you will have when you take up your new post (do you have a suit, by the way?) will be getting your head around the technological overload we are all now living with.  Fifty years ago, when The Listener was still flapping on the news-stands, Ben Britten wrote about the holy triangle of composer, performer and listener. And &#039;listening&#039; was recognized as something to be understood and even practiced, in the same way as speech was and is (but for how much longer?).  I&#039;ve lost count of the number of couples I have seen over the last few years communicating (perhaps with each other?) at a restaurant table, using a smart-phone or (increasingly) a pad. Sitting down to a meal with another human being used to be an opportunity to eat, hopefully, good food, an enjoyable ambience, and a rewarding conversation on, perhaps, the future of the BBC.  Today it seems more like a stopping-off point between one vital moment and another.
If the listener doesn&#039;t want to listen, and they just want to live on sound-bites and celebrity, where do you start?
You can hear that the rot has set-in on R3 and increasingly R4 any day of the week. The fruitless battle for audience share that R3 has waged (and lost) by chasing Classic FM&#039;s audience with &#039;jocks&#039; and &#039;charts&#039; has resulted in mass abandonment by an already small audience, who have voted with their feet, and now listen to mostly online US and Euro &#039;serious&#039; programmes that meet their needs. It is not too much of a stretch to imagine that R3 will, quite soon, go the way of The Listener.  I never thought I would say it, but today I would say &#039;good riddance&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Frank, I&#8217;m with you on most of that. A life without Petroc Trelawny and Vanessa Feltz will be difficult for a while, but I will be able to &#8216;move on&#8217; eventually. The main problem you will have when you take up your new post (do you have a suit, by the way?) will be getting your head around the technological overload we are all now living with.  Fifty years ago, when The Listener was still flapping on the news-stands, Ben Britten wrote about the holy triangle of composer, performer and listener. And &#8216;listening&#8217; was recognized as something to be understood and even practiced, in the same way as speech was and is (but for how much longer?).  I&#8217;ve lost count of the number of couples I have seen over the last few years communicating (perhaps with each other?) at a restaurant table, using a smart-phone or (increasingly) a pad. Sitting down to a meal with another human being used to be an opportunity to eat, hopefully, good food, an enjoyable ambience, and a rewarding conversation on, perhaps, the future of the BBC.  Today it seems more like a stopping-off point between one vital moment and another.<br />
If the listener doesn&#8217;t want to listen, and they just want to live on sound-bites and celebrity, where do you start?<br />
You can hear that the rot has set-in on R3 and increasingly R4 any day of the week. The fruitless battle for audience share that R3 has waged (and lost) by chasing Classic FM&#8217;s audience with &#8216;jocks&#8217; and &#8216;charts&#8217; has resulted in mass abandonment by an already small audience, who have voted with their feet, and now listen to mostly online US and Euro &#8216;serious&#8217; programmes that meet their needs. It is not too much of a stretch to imagine that R3 will, quite soon, go the way of The Listener.  I never thought I would say it, but today I would say &#8216;good riddance&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
